FXQ - Back Testing Results
Below are given back testing results of the currently traded FXQ strategy (ver. 11/2012), generated by the software. These results should be considered as extrapolation into the past of the real trading FXQ, which started live trading on January 3, 2013. It replaced the previous version of the strategy, which has been trading since November 1, 2008. Performance fees (20% of new net profit above high water mark) are not deducted from back testing results. To see actual trading results, please go to the FXQ / Real Performance page.
FXQ features:
- The variability of returns is relatively low and the Sharpe, Sortino, Calmar and Omega Ratios are excellent - among the highest in the currency trading industry. The strategy is extremely robust i.e. insensitive to parameter changes (it is not a curve fitted, or over optimized system), which usually promises excellent performance in forward trading, after the back testing period.
- There is no upper limit on the account size. By trading more frequently (for example, 1/3 of account traded every 8 hours) the strategy can trade accounts of virtually any size without performance degradation (it would be even improved, due to time-factor diversification)
- The strategy is not affected by price slippage (it trades in small increments, by market orders, only once a day). Hence, the actual trading results are very close to hypothetical results. See "Transaction costs" above.
- FXQ tends to recover relatively quickly from deep drawdowns - see the Drawdown chart and Drawdown histogram below.
- The strategy was never negative on annual basis (see the 12 Month Rolling Return graph below).
FXQ - Ver.09/2011 - HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FROM STRATEGY BACK TESTING
1. Monthly Rates of Return (ROR), Before Performance Fees
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Total |
VAMI |
1999 |
1.21% | (0.32%) | 2.05% | (1.77%) | 2.23% | 0.45% | (1.06%) | 2.57% | 0.82% | 0.38% | 0.73% | 1.34% | 8.88% | 1,088.8 |
2000 |
2.19% | 1.75% | 1.99% | 0.11% | 1.20% | 2.40% | 1.10% | 2.01% | 2.20% | 2.07% | 2.80% | 0.74% | 22.57% | 1,334.6 |
2001 |
2.84% | 3.13% | 1.29% | 1.87% | (0.25%) | 2.33% | 1.53% | 1.20% | (0.56%) | 2.79% | 0.81% | 1.83% | 20.41% | 1,607.0 |
2002 |
1.12% | 1.13% | 0.30% | 1.21% | 0.60% | (0.46%) | 0.97% | 2.95% | 1.35% | 1.23% | 1.15% | (0.78%) | 11.25% | 1,787.7 |
2003 |
2.23% | (0.24%) | 2.73% | 1.25% | 3.24% | (0.41%) | 4.35% | 1.24% | 1.87% | 0.93% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 20.47% | 2,153.6 |
2004 |
2.13% | 3.03% | 5.20% | 3.63% | 4.63% | 5.85% | 3.16% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 0.93% | 2.18% | 4.16% | 45.65% | 3,136.7 |
2005 |
2.86% | 2.06% | 3.00% | 1.80% | 1.37% | (0.08%) | 4.95% | 0.11% | 0.72% | 3.47% | 0.67% | 1.30% | 24.48% | 3,904.7 |
2006 |
1.48% | 1.38% | (3.76%) | 2.62% | 3.67% | 5.33% | 0.74% | (0.26%) | 1.20% | 0.25% | (1.11%) | (0.41%) | 11.37% | 4,348.9 |
2007 |
0.68% | 1.18% | 0.97% | (0.63%) | (0.96%) | (0.48%) | 0.65% | (0.73%) | (1.05%) | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.46% | 4.51% | 4,545.1 |
2008 |
1.51% | 1.31% | 0.86% | 3.48% | 1.64% | 1.53% | 1.16% | (0.17%) | 0.83% | 8.44% | 7.06% | 0.86% | 32.06% | 6,002.4 |
2009 |
3.57% | 5.50% | (0.77%) | 4.42% | (1.82%) | 3.54% | 0.50% | 0.63% | (0.10%) | 1.17% | 2.05% | 0.80% | 21.02% | 7,264.2 |
2010 |
0.15% | (0.91%) | 0.89% | 1.05% | 1.60% | (0.56%) | 1.85% | 1.03% | (1.13%) | 1.72% | (0.41%) | (0.02%) | 5.35% | 7,652.8 |
2011 |
1.71% | 0.39% | 0.18% | 0.09% | 0.49% | 1.16% | 0.09% | (0.16%) | 3.08% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 0.36% | 10.59% | 8,463.0 |
2012 | (1.33%) | 0.49% | 0.34% | 0.68% | (0.17%) | 0.11% | (1.99%) | 0.22% | 0.96% | 0.48% | 0.90% | (0.38%) | 0.28% | 8,486.6 |
2013 | Start of live trading. See the FXQ real performance page. |
2. Performance Statistics FXQ - V.11/2012 (Before Performance Fees)
|
|
|
|
* - Total long/short position value is roughly 2 × strategy leverage. It is used for portfolio turnover and costs calculations. Leverage (long only position value) is used as a measure of exposure.
3. Performance Graphs and Histograms
3.1 Monthly Graphs
Note the semi-logarithmic co-ordinates in the VAMI chart
The above histogram shows that:
1. There is very regular, bell-shaped, thin tailed distribution of 5-day rolling rates of return . Robust systems, which are not curve-fitted usually have this type of distribution.
2. The 5-day rolling rate of return (ROR) mean is positive and equals 0.299%. There is a 50% probability that the 5-day rate of return will be greater than 0.299% and 50% probability the return will be less than 0.299%.
3. 5-Day RORs are more clustered in the positive territory in the histogram above. There is a 31.4% probability that a 5-day ROR will be negative and a 68.6% probability the 5-day ROR will be positive.
4. The 5-day Value-at-Risk (VaR) for the 95% confidence level is 0.94%. This means that the risk of loss in a 5-day period is 0.94%, with a 95% probability. The probability of loss of more than 0.94% in a 5 day period is 5%. Similarly, the 5-day VaR for the 99% confidence level is 2.30%. Excessive negative RORs do and will happen, although with decreasing probability. To see these calculations open the 5 Day ROR Percentile tab in this Excel workbook.
The Drawdown Histogram above shows:
1.) how many days the system was in drawdown of given magnitude (the red colored line). The back testing period is 3638 days;
2.) what time (as a percentage of the total back testing time) the system spent below a given drawdown level (the blue colored line). For example, the system spent only 5% of time (182 out of 3638 days) in drawdown worse than 2.43%, and only 1% (36 out of 3638 days) in drawdown worse than 4.11%. These figures also give some idea on the recovery time. Calculations can be found in this Excel worksheet (1.1 MB), under the Drawdown Histogram tab.
The most important facts to remember from the Drawdown Histogram are that:
1.) large drawdowns are relatively rare (the larger the drawdown - the less the probability, although it does exist - see the 11.21% drawdown far left in the histogram above);
2.) the system quickly recovers from extremely large drawdowns. There is no answer, however, how deep the drawdown can go; statistics only show it should not last for too long. This chart also shows how important it is to be patient and not to quit trading during drawdown (which is the worst possible moment to do so).
The above tables and charts document FXQ historical hypothetical performance based on back testing results. To see actual trading results, go to the FXQ Real Performance page (after January 3 , 2013).
Please note that performance results reported are before performance fees, which decrease returns. Interest on open positions is not taken into account in hypothetical results.
Hypothetical Performance Disclaimer:
HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT ACTUALLY BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVERCOMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PLATFORMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.
Risk Disclaimer
THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING COMMODITIES CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL. YOU SHOULD THEREFORE CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THE PERFORMANCE QUOTED REPRESENTS PAST PERFORMANCE AND CURRENT PERFORMANCE MAY BE LOWER OR HIGHER. TRADING IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE IS SPECULATIVE AND MAY INVOLVE THE LOSS OF PRINCIPAL; THEREFORE, FUNDS PLACED UNDER MANAGEMENT SHOULD BE RISK CAPITAL FUNDS THAT IF LOST WILL NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT ONE'S PERSONAL WELL BEING. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION TO INVEST AND YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION PRIOR TO MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR ENTERING INTO ANY TRANSACTION.